Author Topic: Pitchfork reviews  (Read 803 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline johnnyg

  • gardening gloves
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
Pitchfork reviews
« on: August 14, 2017, 09:10:33 AM »
I believe that this has been discussed here before, but why does pitchfork hate the Melvins so much? You'd think they would at least dig them *sometimes*- an independent band releases weird, avant-garde metal. That's the stuff pitchfork usually loves (when not covering mainstream hip hop).

The Dale review seems especially mean:

Not to mention, the writer seems to be pretty poorly informed in general - The nirvana stuff is such old hat, acting like Houdini is their only point of reference, and immediately talking about Colossus in regards to weirder Melvins projects as if they havent done anything else unusual. Plus, the weird dale drum interludes seem to go right over the writer's head. That record is cool, people.

I mean, why the beef, man?

Offline vince furnier

  • godfather of grunge
  • ******
  • Posts: 1935
  • Gender: Male
  • see my only mind explode, when I've gone insane!
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork reviews
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2017, 09:54:20 AM »
Welcome to my Nightmare!

"uh no, but we do know that meezer is vince furnier" - brian

Offline jules

  • *******
  • Posts: 21023
  • A bad mouth betrays a bad mind
    • View Profile
'Anything doused in any kind of curry is great'  -  spunkmonkey

'Life is silly. The appropriate response is laughter' - amazonAMAZON

Offline deatheats

  • watches fox red eye
  • ******
  • Posts: 5747
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork reviews
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2017, 03:37:23 PM »
See they don't hate the Melvins....just their music :)